Zapps are tools (not services) that trade convenience for autonomy: they run primarily on the user’s device, store state locally in open formats, and don’t require an account or a maker-owned server. The opposite of SaaS, in the literal sense.

The label was invented to give the design pattern a name so it can be built deliberately, and to make it easier for AI coding assistants to follow when scaffolding new projects.

Neither model is universally right. Zapps are well-suited to single-user tools and small-group products. They are a poor fit for collaboration-heavy or notification-driven products. The pages below try to be honest about both ends.

Start here

  • Zapp Manifesto — the philosophy and the autonomy/convenience trade-off it makes.
  • Zapp Architecture Patterns — the concrete engineering techniques (OAuth Device Flow, Napkin URL state, Walkie-Talkie networking, Git-as-Backend, OS-folder sync).
  • Why Buy Once Software Died — historical context for how the old “own it forever” model collapsed and why a modern revival is feasible.

When the pattern fits — and when it doesn’t

  • When Zapps are Wrong — workloads, user populations, and operator situations where the model is a bad choice.
  • Zapp Anti-Patterns — common drift-back-to-SaaS mistakes builders make in good faith.
  • The Discovery Problem — the hardest unsolved problem in the philosophy: how anyone finds a Zapp in the first place.

Reference

Inspiration